Sony is committed to strong corporate governance. As a part of this effort, Sony adopted a "Company with Committees" corporate governance system under the Japanese Companies Act. In addition to complying with the requirements of laws and regulations, Sony has introduced its own system to help improve the soundness and transparency of its governance by strengthening the separation of the Directors' function from that of management and advancing the proper functioning of the statutory committees. Under Sony's system, the Board of Directors defines the respective areas for which each of the Corporate Executive Officers is responsible and delegates to them decision-making authority to manage the business, thereby promoting the prompt and efficient management of the Sony Group.
Sony Corporation is governed by its Board of Directors, which is appointed by resolution at the shareholders' meeting. The Board has three committees (the Nominating Committee, Audit Committee and Compensation Committee), consisting of Directors named by the Board of Directors. Corporate Executive Officers are appointed by resolution of the Board of Directors. In addition to these statutory bodies and positions, Sony has Corporate Executives who carry out business operations within designated areas.

Board of Directors:
Nominating Committee:
Audit Committee:
Compensation Committee:
Corporate Executive Officers:
Corporate Executives:
To strengthen its governance structure beyond legal requirements, Sony Corporation includes several provisions in its Charter of the Board of Directors to ensure the separation of the Board of Directors from the execution of business, and to advance the proper functioning of the statutory committees. The main provisions are as follows:
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, the Board of Directors convened ten times. The Nominating Committee met four times, the Audit Committee met 15 times and the Compensation Committee met six times. All 12 outside Directors participated in all meetings of the Board of Directors held during his/her tenure period of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 except for Peter Bonfield and Yukako Uchinaga. (Peter Bonfield participated in nine meetings out of ten; Yukako Uchinaga participated in six meetings out of seven.) Also, all 12 outside Directors who are members of Committees participated in at least 75 percent of the aggregate number of meetings of each Committee held during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, except for Yoshihiko Miyauchi and Yukako Uchinaga (both of Yoshihiko Miyauchi and Yukako Uchinaga are currently members of the Nominating Committee and participated in two meetings out of three held during his/her tenure period of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.) All three outside Directors who are members of the Audit Committee participated in all meetings of the Audit Committee held during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.
Sony Corporation has an internal audit division, which coordinates closely with the internal audit departments of major subsidiaries around the world to promote Sony Group's internal audit activities on a global basis. The Sony Corporation internal audit division makes periodic presentations and submits monthly reports to the Audit Committee. To help assure its independence, the appointment and dismissal of the person in charge of the Sony Corporation internal audit division and heads of internal audit in each region or in each business domain of Sony Group is subject to the prior approval of the Audit Committee.
The United States adopted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in 2002 in response to a series of U.S. accounting scandals and corporate governance abuses. Sony is subject to the SOX regulations because it is a foreign private issuer of equity securities registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and subject to SEC reporting requirements. Among other requirements, SOX requires the CEO and the CFO of Sony Corporation to sign certain certifications to accompany the Sony Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC, relating to the "fair presentation" of the consolidated financial statements, disclosure controls and procedures, and internal control over financial reporting. Sony has established "Disclosure Controls and Procedures," through which potentially material information is reported from important business units, subsidiaries, affiliated companies and corporate divisions and is reviewed and considered for disclosure in light of its materiality to the Sony Group. The "Disclosure Committee," comprised of officers and senior management of the Sony Group who oversee investor relations, accounting, corporate planning, legal, corporate communications, finance, internal audit and human resources, supervises the preparation of Sony's annual reports, current reports, quarterly earnings releases and other material disclosure, and assists the CEO, the President and the CFO in the establishment and implementation of this system and also in assuring the accuracy of financial reporting. Effective for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, SOX also requires the inclusion of a management report on the company's internal control over financial reporting in the Form 20-F. In order to ensure compliance with this requirement, Sony formed a cross-functional steering committee comprised of headquarters management to monitor necessary actions including documentation, testing and evaluation of controls and to perform oversight and assessment of the global evaluation. Based on their evaluation, management has concluded that Sony maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2009.
At a Board meeting held on April 26, 2006, the Board of Directors reaffirmed the existing internal control and governance framework (including the system regarding rules and other structure of risk management) and determined to continue to evaluate and improve such framework going forward, as appropriate. At a Board meeting held on May 13, 2009 the Board of Directors reaffirmed such internal control and governance framework, as slightly amended, in effect as of the date of determination and determined to continue to evaluate and improve such amended framework going forward, as appropriate. This determination was required by and met the requirements of the Companies Act.
URL